Most individuals infected with the AIDS virus have no symptoms and feel well for a long time before eventually developing such symptoms as fever and night sweats, weight loss, swollen lymph glands in the neck, the underarms and groin area, sever fatigue or tiredness, diarrhea, white spots or unusual blemishes in the mouth. These symptoms are also symptoms of a number of other illnesses and that should be taken into consideration. Anyone with any of these symptoms for more than two weeks should not panic buy should consult their doctor.

The AIDS virus is not spread through normal daily contact at work, school or home. There have been no cases found where the virus has been transmitted by casual contact with AIDS patients in the home, workplace, or health care setting.

There is an antibody test that detects antibodies to the AIDS virus that causes the disease. The body produces antibodies that try to get rid of bacteria, viruses, or anything else that is not supposed to be in the bloodstream. The test may show if someone has been infected with the AIDS virus. While the testing procedure is considered accurate, it does not tell who will develop full-blown AIDS.

Download (PDF)

Sample

Quarantine and the Problem of AIDS
David F. Musto
Men take diseases, one of another.
Therefore let men take heed of their company.
Henry IV, Part 2

In ancient times citizens noted that, occasionally, a disease from a distant locale was sweeping toward them from neighboring villages, or that after a ship from a foreign land reached shore with ill persons aboard, residents in the port city would take ill. Such temporal sequences could not be ignored and, if the illness were a serious one, fears escalated as the illness came closer. Knowing the cause of an illness or its mode of transmission provides the basis for some rational approach to containing the spread of the disease. Prior to the nineteenth century, however, these agents were unknown, and civil authorities were thus left with whatever means seemed reasonable in the wisdom of the time to fight the spread of diseases. Protective measures were based on what we would now consider erroneous explanations for contagion. From this era of scant knowledge comes the origin of the familiar word we use to describe the isolation of the sick or contagious from the healthy. “Quarantine” comes from the Italian word for “forty days,” and refers to the period during which ships capable of carrying contagious disease, such as plague, were kept isolated on their arrival at a seaport.

Today, quarantine has come to mean a marking off, the creation of a boundary to ward off a feared biological contaminant lest it penetrate a healthy population. The essential characteristic of quarantine is the establishing of a boundary to separate the contaminated from the uncontaminated. But to consider only those quarantines of diseases that are infectious or that have short periods of illness, characterized by, say, fever, would be to overlook the deeper emotional and broader aggressive character of this measure. Evidence of this elemental fear of contagion includes such instances as measures taken against yellow fever in the eighteenth century and the growing fear of the AIDS epidemic in the late twentieth century. The assumptions and psychology of quarantine are evident in restrictions against groups thought liable to degrade “racial purity” if allowed to immigrate into a “racially healthy” country. The multiple determinants of quarantine can be seen in a much earlier age also. The social history of leprosy is an enduring and dramatic example of boundaries being drawn around those with a lengthy illness that was highly feared and believed to be highly contagious.

Read Online (HTML)